4.7 Article

Function of junB in transient amplifying cell senescence and progression of human prostate cancer

期刊

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
卷 14, 期 14, 页码 4408-4416

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-4120

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Replicative senescence in cells acts as a barrier against excessive proliferation and carcinogenesis. Transient amplifying cells (TAC) are a subset of basal cell populations within the prostate from which cancers are thought to originate; therefore, we focused on prostate TAC to investigate the molecular mechanisms by which the TAC may be able to evade senescence. Experimental Design: TAC clones were isolated from each zone within the whole prostate and analyzed in flow cytometry. Prostate cancer cells were transfected with junB small interfering RNA (siRNA) and examined by chorioallantoic membrane assay for cancer invasion. Immunohistochemical analysis was done in primary and metastatic prostate cancer specimens. Results: TAC populations showed increased expression of p53, p21, p16, and pRb, resulting in senescence. TAC clones with reduced p16 expression successfully bypassed this phase. We further found close correlation between the levels of junB and p16 expression. Repeated transfection of junB siRNA in prostatic TAC allowed the cells to escape senescence presumably through inactivation of p16/pRb. The chorioallantoic membrane invasion assay showed much lower in invasive cancer cells with high expression of junB; conversely, silencing of junB by transfection with junB si RNA promoted invasion. We also found that metastatic prostate cancers, as well as cancers with high Gleason scores, showed significantly low junB immunopositivity. Conclusions: JunB is an essential upstream regulator of p16 and contributes to maintain cell senescence that blocks malignant transformation of TAC. JunB thus apparently plays an important role in controlling prostate carcinogenesis and may be a new target for cancer prevention and therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据