4.7 Article

Suppression of Peutz-Jeghers polyposis by targeting mammalian target of rapamycin signaling

期刊

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
卷 14, 期 4, 页码 1167-1171

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-4007

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA16672, R03 CA89843, R03 CA123603] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Peutz-Jeghers syndrome (PJS) is a unique disorder characterized by the development of hamartomas in the gastrointestinal tract as well as increased risks for variety of malignancies. Germ-line mutations of LKB1 cause PJS. We have generated Lkb1(+/-) mice, which model human PJS. Rapamycin and its analogues are promising preventive and therapeutic agents that specifically inhibit signaling from mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR). Hyperactivation of mTOR signaling has been associated with PJS. The objective of the study is to investigate the efficacy of mTOR inhibition in suppressing Peutz-Jeghers polyposis in Lkb1(+/-) mice. Experimental Design: We initiated a trial of rapamycin in Lkb1(+/-) mice at 9 months of age (after the onset of polyposis) at the dose of 2 mg/kg/d for a 2-month period. We assessed the efficacy of rapamycin by measuring polyp sizes and tumor burden. To examine the effect of rapamycin on mTOR signaling, phosphorylation levels of S6 were evaluated by immunostaining. Results: We observed a significant decrease in mean tumor burden (Student's t test, P = 0.023) as well as total tumor burden in rapamycin-treated group compared with control group. Comparison of the polyp size observed in both rapamycin-treated and control groups showed that rapamycin efficiently decreased the tumor burden of large polyps (>8 mm). This inhibition of rapamycin was associated with a decrease in phosphorylated S6 levels in the polyps. Conclusions: Rapamycin effectively suppresses Peutz-Jeghers polyposis in a mouse model, suggesting that rapamycin or its analogues may represent a new targeted therapy for the treatment of PJS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据