4.3 Article

Gait analysis after bi-compartmental knee replacement

期刊

CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS
卷 24, 期 9, 页码 751-754

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2009.07.014

关键词

Knee OA; BKR; Gait; Knee mechanics

资金

  1. BSU S.E.E.T

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: It is reported that a majority of the patients with knee osteoarthritis have cartilage degeneration in medial and patellofemoral compartments. A bi-compartmental knee replacement system was designed to treat osteoarthritis at medial and patellofemoral compartments. To date, there is very little information regarding the knee mechanics during gait after bi-compartmental knee replacement. The purpose of the study was to evaluate knee strength and mechanics during level walking after knee replacement. Methods: Ten healthy control subjects and eight patients with unilateral bi-compartmental knee replacement participated in the study. Maximal isokinetic concentric knee extension strength was evaluated. 3D kinematic and kinetic analyses were conducted for level walking. Paired Student t-test was used to determine difference between surgical and non-involved limbs. One way MANOVA was used to determine difference between surgical and control groups. Findings: The surgical knee exhibited less peak torque and initial abduction moment than both the non-involved and control limbs (P < 0.05). The non-involved limb had less knee extension at stance and greater knee extensor moment during push-off than both the surgical and control limbs (P < 0.05). No differences were found for other typical knee mechanics among the surgical, non-involved, and control limbs during walking (P > 0.05). Interpretations: Patients with bi-compartmental knee replacement exhibited good frontal plane knee mechanics and were able to produce the same level of knee extensor moment as healthy control limbs during walking. While showing some compensatory patterns during walking, patients with bi-compartmental knee replacement largely exhibited normal gait patterns and knee mechanics. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据