4.5 Article

Association between irisin and homocysteine in euglycemic and diabetic subjects

期刊

CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 47, 期 18, 页码 333-335

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2014.08.017

关键词

Irisin; Homocysteine; Cardiovascular risk factors; Nicotinamide; Myokine

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [DEP2012-37494]
  2. Carlos III Health Institute [PI12/1984, PI13/1025, PI13/0073, CIBERehd CB06/04/0071, CP10/00360]
  3. European Regional Development Fund of the European Union (FEDER)
  4. Regional Ministry of Education of Valencian Community [PROMETEO 2010/060]
  5. Ministry of Health of the Valencian Regional Government [CES10/030]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: The aim of study was to explore whether a relationship exists between homocysteine and irisin in type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients-a population with a high risk of developing cardiovascular disease-and euglycemic controls. Design and methods: 69 T2D patients and 75 control subjects (adjusted by body mass index (BMI)) were included in the study. Irisin and homocysteine concentrations and anthropometric and biochemical variables were determined. Results: Levels of homocysteine were significantly higher (11.0 +/- 3.0 vs 12.4 +/- 4.2 mu mol/l) and levels of irisin were lower (279 +/- 58 vs 263 +/- 38 ng/ml) in T2D patients. When both T2D and controls were considered, irisin was found to correlate only with homocysteine (r = -0.215; p = 0.011). Moreover, a decreasing trend in irisin levels was observed according to homocysteine tertile (p = 0.034). Conclusions: Our results provide evidence of an association between irisin and homocysteine, which may be due to nicotinamide metabolism. The clinical significance of this relationship is unclear, but our findings may prompt further mechanistic research to investigate the role played by irisin in vascular disorders. (C) 2014 The Canadian Society of Clinical Chemists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据