4.5 Article

Defining adrenal status with salivary cortisol by gold-standard insulin hypoglycemia

期刊

CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 46, 期 15, 页码 1442-1446

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2013.05.004

关键词

Adrenal function; Adrenal insufficiency; Salivary cortisol; Free cortical; Insulin hypoglycemia test

资金

  1. Division of Endocrinology, University of Calgary

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Insulin-induced hypoglycemia (IHT) is considered the gold standard test for evaluating the HPA axis. Serum free cortisol or its surrogate, salivary cortisol,as opposed to total cortisol concentrations, offers a better reflection of the activation of HPA axis. Our study aimed to derive reference ranges for the normal salivary cortisol levels in healthy patients and patients with adrenal insufficiency. Design and methods: Serum cortisol concentrations, using the gold standard of IHT, and salivary cortisol were obtained. 36 patients referred to our outpatient endocrine testing unit for evaluation of adrenal function were included in the study. Most subjects had a history of suspected hypothalamic/pituitary disease causing adrenal insufficiency. Results: We found a strong linear correlation between the serum and salivary cortisol concentrations in simultaneously collected samples (r = 0.81, 95% CI 0.74-0.86, p < 0.0001). The corresponding salivary cortisol equivalent to a serum cortisol of 500 nmol/L, using a linear-regression equation, was 16.7 nmol/L (95% CI 13.3-20.1 nmol/L, p = 0.0001). A salivary cortisol of 13.3 nmol/L has a specificity of 89.3% to detect abnormal HPA function. Using the upper 95% CI result of salivary cortical 20.1 yields a sensitivity of 87.5%. Conclusion: With the present assay, adrenal insufficiency may be diagnosed with reasonable confidence if a random salivary cortisol is lower than 13.3 nmol/L and excluded if a random salivary cortisol is higher than 20.1 nmol/L. Future studies should correlate these thresholds with clinical outcomes. (c) 2013 The Canadian Society of Clinical Chemists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据