4.3 Article

Central dopamine deficiency in pure autonomic failure

期刊

CLINICAL AUTONOMIC RESEARCH
卷 18, 期 2, 页码 58-65

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s10286-008-0457-0

关键词

pure autonomic failure; Parkinson; fluorodopa; dopamine; DOPAC

资金

  1. Intramural NIH HHS Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective Pure autonomic failure (PAF) and Parkinson's disease (PD) share several clinical laboratory abnormalities; however, PAF is not associated with parkinsonism. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that preservation of nigrostriatal dopaminergic innervation explains the absence of motor dysfunction in PAF. Methods Patients with PAF (N = 5) or PD (N = 21) and control subjects (N = 14) had brain 6-[F-18]fluorodopa positron emission tomographic scanning and cerebrospinal fluid catechol measurements. A patient with PAF and another with PD had rapid postmortem striatal, nigral, and sympathetic ganglion sampling, with assays of catechols and tyrosine hydroxylase activity. Results The PAF and PD groups had similarly low mean substantia nigra (SN):occipital (OCC) ratios of 6[-(18)supercript stopF]fluorodopa-derived radioactivity and similarly low cerebrospinal fluid dihydroxyphenylacetic acid and DOPA levels. Only the PD group, however, had low PUT:OCC, caudate:OCC, or PUT:SN ratios. The PAF and PD cases had similarly low SN tissue concentrations of dopamine and tyrosine hydroxylase activity, but the PD patient had tenfold lower PUT dopamine and the PAF patient 15-fold lower myocardial norepinephrine concentrations. Conclusions Surprisingly, PAF and PD entail similarly severe nigral and overall central dopaminergic denervation. There is more severe loss of striatal dopaminergic terminals in PD than in PAF and more severe loss of sympathetic noradrenergic terminals in PAF than in PD. These differences explain the distinctive clinical manifestations of the two Lewy body diseases. Parkinsonism appears to reflect striatal dopamine deficiency rather than loss of nigral dopaminergic neurons per se.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据