3.9 Article

Reduced Frequency of Memory T Cells and Increased Th17 Responses in Patients with Active Tuberculosis

期刊

CLINICAL AND VACCINE IMMUNOLOGY
卷 19, 期 10, 页码 1667-1676

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/CVI.00390-12

关键词

-

资金

  1. Colciencias (Bogota, Colombia) [1115-408-20488]
  2. Estrategia de Sostenibilidad (Comite para el Desarrollo de la Investigacion, CODI
  3. Universidad de Antioquia)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Phenotypic and functional alterations in Mycobacterium tuberculosis T cell subsets have been reported in patients with active tuberculosis. A better understanding of these alterations will increase the knowledge about immunopathogenesis and also may contribute to the development of new diagnostics and prophylactic strategies. Here, the ex vivo phenotype of CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells and the frequency and phenotype of gamma interferon (IFN-gamma)- and interleukin 17 (IL-17)-producing cells elicited in shortterm and long-term cultures following CFP-10 and purified protein derivative (PPD) stimulation were determined in noninfected persons (non-TBi), latently infected persons (LTBi), and patients with active tuberculosis (ATB). Phenotypic characterization of T cells was done based on the expression of CD45RO and CD27. Results show that ATB had a reduced frequency of circulating CD4(+) CD45RO(+) CD27(+) T cells and an increased frequency of CD4(+) CD45RO(-) CD27(+) T cells. ATB also had a higher frequency of circulating IL-17-producing CD4(+) T cells than did LTBi after PPD stimulation, whereas LTBi had more IFN-gamma-producing CD4(+) T cells than did non-TBi. The phenotype of IFN-gamma -producing cells at 24 h differs from the phenotype of IL-17-producing cells with no differences between LTBi and ATB. At 144 h, IFN-gamma- and IFN-gamma IL-17-producing cells were mainly CD45RO(+) CD27(+) T cells and they were more frequent in ATB. These results suggest that M. tuberculosis infection induces alterations in T cells which interfere with an adequate specific immune response.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据