3.9 Article

Short-Term Reproducibility of a Commercial Interferon Gamma Release Assay

期刊

CLINICAL AND VACCINE IMMUNOLOGY
卷 16, 期 8, 页码 1170-1175

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/CVI.00168-09

关键词

-

资金

  1. Alexander von Humboldt Foundation
  2. Norwegian Council for Higher Education
  3. NRF-RCN
  4. Foundation for Innovative Diagnostic TB Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Interferon gamma release assays (IGRAs) have been shown to be sensitive and highly specific for the detection of immune memory against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Little is known about the reproducibility and within-person variability of these assays. Various aspects of short-term reproducibility of a commercial IGRA, the QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT-IT) assay, were assessed. The QFT-IT assay was performed twice within 3 days in 27 health care workers in Cape Town, South Africa. Two sets of tests were performed by different operators on day 1, and one set was performed on day 3. Aspects such as interoperator, intraoperator, day-to-day variability, and test-retest variability as well as different the storage methods of plasma were investigated. Seventeen of 27 (63%) of participants had at least one positive QFT-IT text; six had discordant results. The agreement of all aspects studied was high, with kappa values between 0.82 and 1.00 for dichotomous measures, and interclass correlations (ICC) of 0.809 to 0.965 were observed for continuous gamma interferon (IFN-gamma) measures. The variability of the magnitude of response was highest comparing measures obtained from individuals on different days ( ICC of 0.809). The magnitude of the IFN-gamma responses between assays performed for individual participants was variable, with ranges from 0.03 to 11 IU/ml, resulting is discordant results for five participants. The results indicate that the QFT-IT assay is a robust and highly reproducible assay. Considerable intraindividual variability occurs in the magnitude of IFN-gamma responses, which may influence the interpretation of serial measures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据