4.3 Review

Emerging role of tumour necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) as a key regulator of inflammatory responses

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1681.2009.05258.x

关键词

apoptosis; asthma; autoimmunity; tumour necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL); viruses

资金

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC)
  2. Cooperative Research Centre Asthma and Airways
  3. Hunter Medical Research Institute
  4. Landesstiftung Baden-Wuerttemberg

向作者/读者索取更多资源

P> Tumour necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) induces apoptosis in tumour cells while leaving most non-transformed cells unharmed. Binding of TRAIL to its death receptors (DR4 and DR5) activates the extrinsic apoptotic pathway by recruiting procaspase 8 into the death-inducing silencing complex. Cleavage of the BH-3 only peptide Bid by caspase 8 links the apoptotic TRAIL signal to the mitochondrial pathway and the subsequent release of cytochrome c. In addition, TRAIL binds to neutralizing decoy receptors (DcR1 and DcR2). Signalling through DcR2, DR4 and DR5 can activate pro-inflammatory intracellular molecules such as mitogen-activated protein kinase, protein kinase B and nuclear factor-kappa B. Recent studies have identified an important role for TRAIL in regulating immune responses to viruses, self-antigen and allergens. Increased concentrations of TRAIL are found in virus infections of the lung and TRAIL affects the antiviral response and resolution of infection. In addition, TRAIL is upregulated in the airways of asthmatics and inhibition results in reduced inflammation, T helper 2 cytokine and CCL20 release, as well as abolishing the development of airway hyperreactivity in experimental models. Characterization of the specific receptor systems activated and the pro-inflammatory factors regulated by TRAIL in vivo may lead to the development of novel therapeutic strategies for diseases as diverse as infection, autoimmunity and asthma.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据