4.2 Article

Effects of amino acids and albumin on erythropoietin carbamoylation

期刊

CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL NEPHROLOGY
卷 17, 期 4, 页码 575-581

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10157-012-0751-y

关键词

Chronic renal failure; Erythropoietin; Carbamoylation; Amino acids; Albumin

资金

  1. Inje University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Anemia in chronic renal failure results from inadequate production of erythropoietin and decrease in its biological activity, and the reduced activity of erythropoietin is caused by the presence of plasma inhibitors of erythropoietin. It is reported that one of the inhibitors of erythropoietin is cyanate, a potential uremic toxin formed spontaneously from increased urea due to decreased renal function, and erythropoietin loses its biological activity due to negatively charged cyanate. The purpose of this study is to investigate the protective effects of amino acids, positively charged amino groups, and albumin binding of several toxins on erythropoietin carbamoylation. The degree of change in erythropoietin structure by cyanate was measured by the trinitrobenzenesulphonate reaction and Western blotting. The loss of biological activity of erythropoietin caused by cyanate was measured by injecting erythropoietin into rats with chronic renal failure. The free amino groups in erythropoietin decreased under cyanate treatment in a time- and concentration-dependent manner. In the cyanate treatment group, of the twenty amino acids, phenylalanine, valine, tryptophan, threonine, and lysine prevented the structural modification of erythropoietin, according to Western blot analysis. In addition, of the three proteins, albumin prevented the structural modification of erythropoietin. As for the cyanate with erythropoietin treatment group, only lysine and albumin prevented the loss of biological activity of erythropoietin in the rats. The results of this study suggest that lysine and albumin may play a protective role against renal anemia by erythropoietin carbamoylation in chronic renal failure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据