4.5 Article

Innate immunity drives xenobiotic-induced murine autoimmune cholangitis

期刊

CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL IMMUNOLOGY
卷 177, 期 2, 页码 373-380

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/cei.12298

关键词

CD4 knock-out mice; CD8 knock-out mice; primary biliary cirrhosis; xenobiotics

资金

  1. National Health Research Institutes, Taiwan [NHRI-EX102-10027SC]
  2. National Taiwan University [NTU-CDP-102R7811]
  3. National Institutes of Health [DK067003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) is considered a model autoimmune disease, it has not responded therapeutically to traditional immunosuppressive agents. In addition, PBC may recur following liver transplantation, despite the absence of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) matching, in sharp contrast to the well-known paradigm of MHC restriction. We have suggested previously that invariant natural killer T (iNK T) cells are critical to the initiation of PBC. In this study we have taken advantage of our ability to induce autoimmune cholangitis with 2-octynoic acid, a common component of cosmetics, conjugated to bovine serum albumin (2-OA-BSA), and studied the natural history of pathology in mice genetically deleted for CD4 or CD8 following immunization with 2-OA-BSA in the presence or absence of alpha-galactosylceramide (alpha-GalCer). In particular, we address whether autoimmune cholangitis can be induced in the absence of traditional CD4 and CD8 responses. We report herein that CD4 and CD8 knock-out mice immunized with 2-OA-BSA/PBS or 2-OA-BSA/alpha-GalCer develop anti-mitochondrial antibodies (AMAs), portal infiltrates and fibrosis. Indeed, our data suggest that the innate immunity is critical for immunopathology and that the pathology is exacerbated in the presence of alpha-GalCer. In conclusion, these data provide not only an explanation for the recurrence of PBC following liver transplantation in the absence of MHC compatibility, but also suggest that effective therapies for PBC must include blocking of both innate and adaptive pathways.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据