4.5 Article

Recipient NOD2/CARD15 status affects cellular infiltrates in human intestinal graft-versus-host disease

期刊

CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL IMMUNOLOGY
卷 159, 期 1, 页码 87-92

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2009.04049.x

关键词

CD4; gastrointestinal GVHD; immunohistology; NOD2; CARD15

资金

  1. Wilhelm-Sander Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

P>Nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain 2/caspase recruitment domain 15 (NOD2/CARD15) polymorphisms have been identified as risk factors of both Crohn's disease and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) following allogeneic stem cell transplantation. However, the role of these receptors of innate immunity in the pathophysiology of gastrointestinal GVHD is still poorly defined. Immunohistological features of intestinal GVHD were analysed in gastrointestinal biopsies from 58 patients obtained at the time of first onset of intestinal symptoms. The observed changes were correlated with concomitant risk factors and the presence of polymorphisms within the pathogen recognition receptor gene NOD2/CARD15. Intestinal GVHD was associated with a stage-dependent decrease in CD4 T cell infiltrates and an increase in CD8 T cells in the lamina propria; CD8 infiltrates correlated with extent of apoptosis and consecutive epithelial proliferation. The presence of NOD2/CARD15 variants in the recipient was associated with a significant loss of CD4 T cells: in a semiquantitative analysis, the median CD4 score for patients with wild-type NOD2/CARD15 was 1 center dot 1 (range 3), but only 0 center dot 4 (range 2) for patients with variants (P = 0 center dot 002). This observation was independent from severity of GVHD in multivariate analyses and could not be explained by the loss of forkhead box P3+ T cells. Our results suggest a loss of protective CD4 T cells in intestinal GVHD which is enhanced further by the presence of NOD2/CARD15 variants. Our study might help to identify more selective therapeutic strategies in the future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据