4.5 Article

Proinflammatory cytokine gene single nucleotide polymorphisms in common variable immunodeficiency

期刊

CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL IMMUNOLOGY
卷 155, 期 1, 页码 21-27

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL PUBLISHING, INC
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2008.03790.x

关键词

common variable immunodeficiency; cytokine; genetic polymorphism; IL-6; TNF-alpha

资金

  1. Tehran University of Medical Sciences and Health Services [4305-30-04-85]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Common variable immunodeficiency (CVID) is a heterogeneous group of primary immunodeficiency diseases. Cytokine production could be affected in CVID patients, whereas its alteration could be due to genetic polymorphisms within coding and promoter regions of the cytokine genes. This study was performed to analyse the proinflammatory cytokine single nucleotide polymorphisms in CVID. The allele and genotype frequencies of a number polymorphic genes coding tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha, interleukin (IL)-1 alpha, IL-1 beta, IL-1R, IL-1RA and IL-6 were investigated and compared between two groups of CVID patients and controls. The IL-6 GA genotype at position nt565 was significantly over-represented in the patient group (P < 0.001), while the IL-6 GG genotype at position -174 (P = 0.006) and the GG genotype at position nt565 (P < 0.001) were significantly lower than controls. The TNF-alpha AG genotype at position -308 in the patient group was increased significantly in comparison with controls (P = 0.027), but the GG genotype at the same position was significantly decreased (P = 0.011). IL-6 CA and GA haplotypes were the most frequent haplotypes in the patients (P < 0.005), whereas TNF-alpha GA (P = 0.002) and IL-6 GG (P < 0.001) haplotypes were decreased significantly in the patients in comparison with controls. Cytokine single nucleotide polymorphisms could have a role in pathophysiology of CVID. High production of TNF-alpha is expected in some CVID patients based on the frequency of genotypes/haplotypes of these cytokine gene polymorphisms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据