4.5 Article

Association between Promoter Polymorphisms of TFF1, TFF2, and TFF3 and the Risk of Gastric and Diffuse Gastric Cancers in a Korean Population

期刊

JOURNAL OF KOREAN MEDICAL SCIENCE
卷 30, 期 8, 页码 1035-U228

出版社

KOREAN ACAD MEDICAL SCIENCES
DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2015.30.8.1035

关键词

Control-case Studies; Diffuse Type; Gastric Neoplasms; Polymorphism; TFF1 Protein; Human; TFF2 Protein; Human; TFF3 Protein; Human

资金

  1. Korea Health Technology R&D Project Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea [HI14C1731]
  2. research fund of Chungnam National University
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Education [NRF-2014R1A6A1029617]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancers in the world. The aims of this study were to evaluate the association between polymorphisms in TFF gene family, TFF1, TFF2, and TFF3 and the risk of gastric cancer (GC) and GC subgroups in a Korean population via a case-control study. The eight polymorphisms in TFF gene family were identified by sequencing and genotyped with 377 GC patients and 396 controls by using TaqMan genotyping assay. The rs184432 TT genotype of TFF1 was significantly associated with a reduced risk of GC (odds ratio, [OR)= 0.45; 95% confidence interval, [CI]= 0.25-0.82; P=0.009), more protective against diffuse-type GC (OR=0.20; 95% CI= 0.05-0.89; P= 0.035) than GC (OR= 0.34; 95% CI= 0.14-0.82; P= 0.017) in subjects aged < 60 yr, and correlated with lymph node metastasis negative GC and diffuse-type GC (OR= 0.44; 95% CI= 0.23-0.86; P = 0.016 and OR = 0.20; 95% CI = 0.05-0.87; P= 0.031, respectively). In addition, a decreased risk of lymph node metastasis negative GC and diffuse-type GC was observed for rs225359 TT genotype of TFF1 (OR= 0.46, 95% CI= 0.24-0.88; P=0.020 and OR=0.21, 95% CI= 0.05-0.88; P=0.033, respectively). These findings suggest that the rs184432 and rs225359 polymorphisms in TFF1 have protective effects for GC and contribute to the development of GC in Korean individuals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据