4.5 Article

Urethroplasty Using Autologous Urethral Tissue-embedded Acellular Porcine Bladder Submucosa Matrix Grafts for the Management of Long-Segment Urethral Stricture in a Rabbit Model

期刊

JOURNAL OF KOREAN MEDICAL SCIENCE
卷 30, 期 3, 页码 301-307

出版社

KOREAN ACAD MEDICAL SCIENCES
DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2015.30.3.301

关键词

Urethral Stricture; Grafts; Urinary Bladder; Urethra; Rabbits

资金

  1. Biomedical Research Institute grant, Kyungpook National University Hospital

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We conducted this study to evaluate the combined effect of acellular bladder submucosa matrix (BSM) and autologous urethral tissue for the treatment of long segment urethral stricture in a rabbit model. To prepare the BSM, porcine bladder submucosa was processed, decellularized, configured into a sheet-like shape, and sterilized. Twenty rabbits were randomized to normal control, urethral stricture, urethroplasty using BSM only or BSM/autologous urethral tissue (n = 5 per group). Retrograde urethrography was performed at 4, 8, and 12 weeks postoperatively, and the grafted specimens were harvested at week 12 to evaluate urethral reconstruction through histopathologic and immunohistochemical analysis. The mean urethral width of the control, stricture, BSM, and BSM/autologous urethral tissue groups at week 12 was 10.3 +/- 0.80, 3.8 +/- 1.35, 8.8 +/- 0.84, and 9.1 +/- 1.14 mm, respectively. The histopathologic study revealed that the BSM/autologous urethral tissue graft had a normal area of urethral lumen, compact muscular layers, complete epithelialization, and progressive infiltration by vessels in the regenerated urethra. In contrast, the BSM grafts revealed keratinized epithelium, abundant collagenized fibrous connective tissue, and were devoid of bundles of circular smooth muscle. Nontransected ventral onlay-augmented urethroplasty using an acellular BSM scaffold combined with an autologous urethral tissue graft represents a feasible procedure for urethral reconstruction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据