4.5 Article

Infection of mice with respiratory syncytial virus during neonatal life primes for enhanced antibody and T cell responses on secondary challenge

期刊

CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL IMMUNOLOGY
卷 153, 期 2, 页码 277-288

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2008.03591.x

关键词

antibody responses; neonatal; spleen/lymph nodes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Primary neonatal immune responses to infection or vaccines are weak when compared with those of adults. In addition, memory responses of neonatally primed animals may be absent, weak or T helper type 2 (Th2)-biased. Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is an important pathogen of human infants and infection during the neonatal period has been linked to the development of asthma in later life. Here we report that acute intranasal infection of neonatal mice with RSV induces significant RSV-specific antibody and CD8 T cell responses. These responses were boosted after RSV rechallenge during adulthood, demonstrating the establishment of memory after neonatal priming. Primary infection during neonatal life was associated, following rechallenge, with limited viral replication in the lung. Recall responses of both spleen and lymph node cells from neonatally primed and adult-primed mice were associated with interferon-gamma secretion, indicative of a Th1-type response. However, interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-5 secretion were enhanced only in spleen and lymph node cells from neonatally primed mice. Rechallenge of neonatally primed mice was also associated with increased concentrations of chemokines monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, macrophage inflammatory protein-1 alpha and regulated upon activation normal T cell expressed and secreted in the lung. These may play a role in the enhanced inflammatory cell recruitment and immunopathology induced following RSV reinfection. Our results demonstrate therefore that immunity to RSV can be established during neonatal life and, importantly, that the quality of the subsequent response is dependent upon the age of first infection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据