4.5 Article

Raman spectroscopy as an analytical tool for melanoma research

期刊

CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL DERMATOLOGY
卷 39, 期 5, 页码 636-645

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/ced.12357

关键词

-

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [SFB 773]
  2. Wissenschaftsforderung der Deutschen Brauwirtschaft eV
  3. Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft Internal programm
  4. Ministry of Science, Research and the Arts of Baden-Wurttemberg [33-729.55-3/214]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Raman spectroscopy is an optical noninvasive screening technology that generates individual fingerprints of living cells by reflecting their molecular constitution. Aim To discriminate melanoma cells from melanocytes, to identify drug-induced melanoma cell death stages (apoptosis, necrosis, autophagy) and to assess the susceptibility of melanoma cells to anticancer therapy. Methods We used Raman spectroscopy on normal and melanoma cells, and on wild-type (WT) and mutant melanoma cells, to investigate whether the technique could distinguish between different types of cells, identify mutations and evaluate response to anticancer therapy. Results Using the multivariate principal component analysis of the Raman spectra, melanocytes could be distinguished from melanoma cells, and WT melanoma cells could be distinguished from melanoma cells with BRAF or NRAS mutations. When we used the apoptosis inducer staurosporine, the necrosis inducer 3-bromopyruvate and the autophagy inducer resveratrol to induce cell death in SKMEL28 melanoma cells, Raman spectroscopy clearly distinguished between these three types of cell death, as confirmed by immunoblotting. Finally, the technique could discriminate between different melanoma cell lines according to their susceptibility to high-dose ascorbate. Conclusions Raman spectroscopy is a powerful noninvasive tool to distinguish between melanocytes and melanoma cells, to analyze the specific type of cell death in melanoma cells, and to predict the susceptibility of melanoma cells to anticancer drugs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据