4.5 Article

Immunomodulatory effects of IL-23 and IL-17 in a mouse model of allergic rhinitis

期刊

CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ALLERGY
卷 43, 期 8, 页码 956-966

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/cea.12123

关键词

allergic rhinitis; immunomodulation; interleukin-17; interleukin-23; mouse model of AR

资金

  1. National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars [81025007]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30973282]
  3. Beijing Natural Science Foundation [7131006]
  4. Ministry of Health Foundation [201202005]
  5. Special Fund of Sanitation Elite Reconstruction of Beijing [2009-2-007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Interleukin-23 (IL-23) and IL-17 may be involved in the pathogenesis of allergic rhinitis (AR). However, a differentiation of the role of IL-23 and IL-17 has not been performed yet. Objective The aim of this study was therefore to investigate the immunomodulatory effects of IL-23 and IL-17, using a mouse model of AR. Methods Anti-IL-23p19 and anti-IL-17 Abs were administrated intranasally during rechallenge in ovalbumin (OVA)-induced AR in BALB/c mice. Immunomodulatory effects were evaluated by measuring nasal rubbing and sneezing occurrences, serum OVA-specific antibodies, Th2 responses (i.e. expression of IL-4, IL-5, IL-13 and IFN-gamma genes in nasal mucosa, IL-4(+) CD4(+) T cells percentages in superficial cervical lymph nodes (LNs) and IL-4 production in LNs stimulated with OVA in vitro), and neutrophil, eosinophil and mast cell recruitment into the nasal mucosa. Results The effect of IL-17 antagonism was limited to attenuating the Th2 responses and neutrophil and eosinophil infiltration. In contrast, treatment with anti-IL-23p19 Abs markedly reduced nasal rubbing and sneezing events, Th2 responses, serum OVA-specific IgE and IgG1 levels, as well as mucosal neutrophil, eosinophil and mast cell infiltration. Conclusion and Clinical Relevance IL-17 and IL-23 may play a pathogenic role in an established AR mouse model; with a more pronounced contribution of IL-23 than IL-17.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据