4.7 Article

MITF Modulates Therapeutic Resistance through EGFR Signaling

期刊

JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE DERMATOLOGY
卷 135, 期 7, 页码 1863-1872

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1038/jid.2015.105

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [K24 CA149202, P01CA163222, 5T32CA071345, 5T32AR007098]
  2. American Skin Association
  3. Swedish Cancer Society
  4. Swedish Research Council
  5. Berta Kamprad Foundation
  6. Gunnar Nilsson Cancer Foundation
  7. Gustav Vth Jubilee Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Response to targeted therapies varies significantly despite shared oncogenic mutations. Nowhere is this more apparent than in BRAF (V600E)-mutated melanomas where initial drug response can be striking and yet relapse is commonplace. Resistance to BRAF inhibitors have been attributed to the activation of various receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs), although the underlying mechanisms have been largely uncharacterized. Here, we found that EGFR-induced vemurafenib resistance is ligand dependent. We employed whole-genome expression analysis and discovered that vemurafenib resistance correlated with the loss of microphthalmia-associated transcription factor (MITF), along with its melanocyte lineage program, and with the activation of EGFR signaling. An inverse relationship between MITF, vemurafenib resistance, and EGFR was then observed in patient samples of recurrent melanoma and was conserved across melanoma cell lines and patients' tumor specimens. Functional studies revealed that MITF depletion activated EGFR signaling and consequently recapitulated the resistance phenotype. In contrast, forced expression of MITF in melanoma and colon cancer cells inhibited EGFR and conferred sensitivity to BRAF/MEK inhibitors. These findings indicate that an autocrine drug resistance loop is suppressed by melanocyte lineage signal(s), such as MITF. This resistance loop modulates drug response and could explain the unique sensitivity of melanomas to BRAF inhibition.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据