4.4 Article

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours

期刊

CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY
卷 10, 期 8, 页码 493-497

出版社

SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING AG
DOI: 10.1007/s12094-008-0238-1

关键词

pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours; insulinoma; nonfunctional tumours; Glucagonoma; conservative surgery

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction Pancreatic neuroendocrine turnouts (PNT) are infrequent epithelial neoplasms associated with a better outcome than pancreatic adenocarcinorna. Materials and methods We analysed our 22 years of experience in managing PNT. Forty-nine patients (27 women and 22 men) with a mean age of 49 years were studied. There were 28 insulinomas, eight glucagonomas, three gastrinomas, one VIPoma and one carcinoid. Eight patients presented with nonfunctional turnours. Enucleation was performed in 20 patients, distal pancreatectomy in 16, middle pancreatic resection in four, cephalic pancreatoduodenectomy in two and total pancreatoduodenectomy in one. In six patients, the tumour was not resected. Results Postoperative complication rate was 22%: six pancreatic fistulas, three intra-abdominal collections, one remnant pancreatitis and one pancreatic pseudocyst. There was no mortality. 39 cases showed benign histologic features and ten malignant ones. Symptomatic palliation was achieved in 94% of the cases. Five patients presented recurrences: three liver metastases and two pancreatic recurrences. Actuarial mean survival was 163 months and was longer in insulinomas, in those turnours completely resected and in turnours with benign histological features. Conclusion Conservative surgery of the pancreas is preferred, but aggressive surgery is indicated when the primary tumour can be controlled. Despite of minimising pancreatic resection, there is a high complication rate, mainly pancreatic fistulas, though they can often be conservatively managed. Insulinomas are the PNT with better outcome; those completely resected also associate a better prognosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据