4.3 Article

LIM kinase inhibition reduces breast cancer growth and invasiveness but systemic inhibition does not reduce metastasis in mice

期刊

CLINICAL & EXPERIMENTAL METASTASIS
卷 30, 期 4, 页码 483-495

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10585-012-9553-6

关键词

LIM kinase inhibitors; Breast cancer; Metastasis; Actin cytoskeleton; Therapy

类别

资金

  1. NIH [R21CA098229]
  2. NHMRC of Australia
  3. NHMRC
  4. NBCF (Australia)
  5. Cancer Therapeutics CRC
  6. Australian Government's Cooperative Research Centre Program
  7. National Breast Cancer Foundation [CG-10-04] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Metastasis is the major cause of morbidity and mortality in cancer patients. An understanding of the genes that regulate metastasis and development of therapies to target these genes is needed urgently. Since members of the LIM kinase (LIMK) family are key regulators of the actin cytoskeleton and are involved in cell motility and invasion, LIMK is considered to be a good therapeutic target for metastatic disease. Here we investigated the consequences of LIMK inhibition on growth and metastasis of human and mouse mammary tumors. LIMK activity was reduced in tumor cells by expression of dominant-negative LIMK1, by RNA interference or with a selective LIMK inhibitor. The extent of phosphorylation of the LIMK substrate, cofilin, of proliferation and invasion in 2D and 3D culture and of tumor growth and metastasis in mice were assessed. Inhibition of LIMK activity efficiently reduced the pro-invasive properties of tumor cells in vitro. Tumors expressing dominant-negative LIMK1 grew more slowly and were less metastatic in mice. However, systemic administration of a LIMK inhibitor did not reduce either primary tumor growth or spontaneous metastasis. Surprisingly, metastasis to the liver was increased after administration of the inhibitor. These data raise a concern about the use of systemic LIMK inhibitors for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据