4.7 Article

Third generation anti-citrullinated peptide antibody assay is a sensitive marker in rheumatoid factor negative rheumatoid arthritis

期刊

CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA
卷 414, 期 -, 页码 266-272

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2012.09.015

关键词

CCP; Citrullinated cyclic peptide; Rheumatoid arthritis; RA; Autoantibodies

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: We compared 2 anti-citrullinated protein antibody (ACPA) assays using a routine patient cohort. Methods: Two-hundred ninety-five sera were collected from patients for whom ACPA was ordered and tested for ACPA by QUANTA Lite (R) CCP 3 (INOVA Diagnostics, Inc., San Diego) and EliA (R) CCP (CCP, Phadia, Germany). Rheumatoid factor (RF) was determined using Quantex RF(II) (Biokit, Spain). Results: Acceptable qualitative (96.6%, kappa=0.93) and quantitative agreements (Spearman rho=0.77; p<0.0001) were observed between the two ACPA assays. Nine samples were CCP3+/CCP2- and one sample was CCP2+/CCP3- Of the 9 CCP3+/CCP2- patients, 6(66.7%) had RA, one patient had ankylosing spondylitis, one osteoarthritis and one psoriatic arthritis. The CCP3-/CCP2+ patient had juvenile RA. At the manufacturer's cut-offs, the sensitivities and specificities were 77.3%/98.1% (CCP2), 81.6%196.8% (CCP3) and 65.2%/89.6% (RF), respectively. At 98.7% specificity level, the sensitivities in the total cohort were 59.6% (CCP2) and 69.5% (CCP3) while the sensitivities in the RF-negative group were 49.0% (CCP2) and 57.1% (CCP3). In the RF-negative group, sensitivities for patients with a disease duration of <= 5 years were 38.7% (CCP2) and 51.6% (CCP3). Conclusion: Discrimination between RA and non-RA patients was better using CCP3, most pronounced in RF-negative RA. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据