4.7 Article

Urine sediment analysis: Analytical and diagnostic performance of sediMAX® - A new automated microscopy image-based urine sediment analyser

期刊

CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA
卷 411, 期 3-4, 页码 147-154

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2009.10.018

关键词

Urine sediment analysis; Automated urine analysis; Urine microscopy; Urine particles; sediMAX/Urised

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: We evaluated the analytical and diagnostic performance of sediMAX (77 Elektronika, Budapest, Hungary), a new automated microscopy image-based urine sediment analyser (which in some countries is also called Urised) in comparison with visual phase-contrast microscopy. Methods: Precision, linearity. carry-over and method comparison were carried out according to well-established guidelines. The diagnostic performance with respect to visual phase-contrast microscopy was evaluated with results from two centres (n(1) = 910, n(2) = 1233). Uncentrifuged urine samples were used in visual microscopy in centre 1, while urine sediments were used in centre 2. Results: Within-run precision for RBC was 17.8% and 6.7% at 18 x E6 RBC/L and 447 x E6 RBC/L respectively and for WBC it was 17% and 4.4% at 4 x E6 WBC/L and 258 x E6/L respectively. Between-run imprecision for RBC was 14.7% for 30 x E6/L and 7.2% for 283 x E6/L For WBC it was 5.4% at 25 x E6/L and 3% at 166 x E6/L In both studies areas under ROC curves (AUC) were 80-90% for RBC, WBC, squamous epithelial cells, yeast and calcium-oxalate crystals. For non-squamous epithelial cells and pathological and hyaline casts the AUC ranged 73-74%. There was no carry-over. Conclusions: The sediMAX is well able to count and identify RBC, WBC, squamous epithelial cells, yeast, bacteria and calcium-oxalate crystals. Recognition of pathological casts and non-squamous epithelial cells is adequate but needs to be improved. (c) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据