4.7 Article

Genetic association between a chemokine gene CXCL-10 (IP-10, interferon gamma inducible protein 10) and susceptibility to tuberculosis

期刊

CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA
卷 406, 期 1-2, 页码 98-102

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2009.06.006

关键词

Tuberculosis; Genetic susceptibility; IP-10; CXCL-10

资金

  1. Health, Welfare and Food Bureau of the Hong Kong SAR Government [CUHK-BS-009]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Previous studies showed that activation of CXCL-10 and other chemokines were prominent in many infectious diseases. These chemokines are components of innate immune response to respiratory tract pathogens. We examined the promoter variants of CXCL-10 and their role in predisposition to tuberculosis (TB). Methods: The promoter 1.8 kb of CXCL-10 was sequenced in 24 healthy Chinese individuals to identify genetic polymorphisms. Three tagging SNPs in CXCL-10 promoter (-1447A>G, -872G>A, -135G>A) were selected, and genotyping were performed in 240 TB patients and 176 healthy Chinese subjects. Disease associations were examined by chi(2) and Fisher exact test. Results: A promoter SNP (-1356>A) with minor allele frequency of 0.1 showed a moderate association with TB both in genotype analysis (p = 0.01) and allelic analysis (p = 0.03); other tagging SNPs (-1447A>G, -872G>A) were not associated with TB. The odd ratio of the protective allele -1356>A was 0.51(C.I 0.29 - 0.91) for homozygotes and heterozygotes carriers of the A allele. Conclusion: A new potential protective SNP (-1356>A) for TB is identified in the promoter of chemokine gene, CXCL-10. Interestingly, the exact same allele has been shown to enhance IP-10 transactivation and susceptibility to Hepatitis B virus infection in a recent publication. This SNP, located at 14 by upstream of a NF-kB binding site, might also account for the susceptibility to TB. Our results expanded the clinical significance of this SNP in CXCL-10 promoter. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据