4.7 Article

Validation of PON1 enzyme activity assays for longitudinal studies

期刊

CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA
卷 402, 期 1-2, 页码 67-74

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2008.12.019

关键词

Paraoxonase; Arylesterase; PON1 activity; Enzymatic assay; Children; Storage; Technical variability; Temperature; Organophosphate; Pesticides; Oxidative stress; Freeze-thaw; Birth cohort

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [DK60617]
  2. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) [R826886, R82670901]
  3. National Institute of Environmental Health Science (NIEHS) [R01ESO12503-03, PO1 ES009605, ES09883, ES09601, ES04696]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Paraoxonase (PON1) enzymatic activity assays are used to characterize sensitivity to organophosphates and oxidative stress. Length of sample storage, temperature and other factors may influence variability of PON1 measurements, especially in longitudinal studies. Methods: Effects of assay temperature, storage duration up to 7 y (-80 degrees C), freeze-thaw cycles, the type of specimen (serum or heparinized plasma) and assay variability were evaluated for 4 PON1 substrate-specific assays using samples from two pediatric cohorts and laboratory volunteers. Results: Intra- and inter-assay variation, as well as inter-laboratory variability for PON1 activities were <10%. The effect of storage duration up to 2 y was minimal. However, after 7 y, arylesterase, paraoxonase, and chlorpyrifos-oxonase activities decreased more noticeably. Similarly, while freeze-thaw cycles did not affect the PON1 activities in samples stored <2 y, this factor was more significant after 7 y for arylesterase. Assay temperature and specimen type also influenced PON1 measurements. Conclusions: Sources of technical variability of PON1 activity assays, including storage duration, freeze-thaw, and temperature should be monitored and minimized through study design, quality control procedures and statistical methods, especially in longitudinal studies where specimens may be stored for years prior to analysis. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据