4.7 Article

Alterations in serum adipocyte fatty acid binding protein and retinol binding protein-4 in normal pregnancy and preeclampsia

期刊

CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA
卷 407, 期 1-2, 页码 58-61

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2009.06.031

关键词

Preeclampsia; Insulin resistance; Adipocyte fatty acid binding protein (AFABP); Retinol binding protein-4 (RBP-4)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Preeclampsia, a pregnancy-specific complication occurring in the second half of human pregnancy and one of the leading causes for perinatal mortality and morbidity, is characterized by the onset of hypertension and proteinuria. We measured circulating adipocyte fatty acid binding protein (AFABP) and retinol binding protein-4 (RBP-4) in patients with preeclampsia. Methods: Twenty-seven healthy non-pregnant women, 27 healthy pregnant women at third trimester and 26 women with preeclampsia were recruited and blood samples were taken. Concentrations of serum AFABP and RBP-4 were measured with ELISA. Results: There were significant differences in serum AFABP (median: 0.99, 0.93 and 1.81 ng/ml, respectively, P < 0.001) and RBP-4 (mean: 3.16, 2.65 and 4.27 ng/ml, respectively, P = 0.022) among non-pregnancy, normal pregnancy and preeclampsia. Serum AFABP was significantly higher in preeclampsia than non-pregnancy (P < 0.001) and normal pregnancy (P = 0.001). Serum RBP-4 was significantly higher in preeclampsia than normal pregnancy (P = 0.007) but not non-pregnancy (P = 0.061). There were no significant differences in serum RBP-4 and AFABP between non-pregnancy and normal pregnancy. Serum RBP-4 was significantly higher in severe than mild preeclampsia (mean: 5.15 vs 2.84 ng/ml, P = 0.046). There was no significant difference in serum AFABP between mild and severe preeclampsia. Conclusion: Increased circulating AFABP and RBP-4 concentrations were demonstrated, suggesting it be an important pathophysiology of preeclampsia. (c) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据