4.7 Article

Two-round allele specific-polymerase chain reaction: A simple and highly sensitive method for JAK2V617F mutation detection

期刊

CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA
卷 401, 期 1-2, 页码 148-151

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2008.12.010

关键词

Myeloproliferative disorders; JAK2 mutation detection; AS-PCR; DHPLC; RFLP; Sequencing

资金

  1. Siriraj Graduate Thesis Scholarship and Mahidol University Graduate Student Alumni Association
  2. Siriraj Chalermprakiat Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Philadelphia chromosome (Ph-1)-negative myeloproliferative disorders (MPD) are hematopoietic stem cell disorders characterized by extensive proliferation of myeloid blood cells. JAK2V617F has recently been identified in the majority of Ph-1-negative MPD and becomes an essential diagnostic marker. Methods: To screen for JAK2V617F, a two-round allele specific-polymerase chain reaction (AS-PCR) was developed and compared to PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP), denaturing high performance liquid chromatography (DHPLC), and DNA sequencing. A primary AS-PCR was performed followed by a secondary AS-PCR, which was an amplification of the primary AS-PCR products using the same set of primers under alternative conditions. Results: By primary AS-PCR, a strong mutant-DNA band was seen in the DNA mixture containing as low as 2.5% of mutant allele. An ambiguous band was seen in 1% dilution while being totally absent in 0.1% dilution. After secondary AS-PCR, a mutant DNA band was clearly detected at 0.01% dilution. The detection sensitivity of PCR-RFLP and DHPLC was 2.5% while sequencing analysis was unable to detect below 5% dilution. Conclusion: Two-round AS-PCR is simple and inexpensive, making it a suitable method for JAK2V617F mutation screening. Moreover, monitoring of minimal residual disease after specific treatment of Ph-1-negative MPD patients should be feasible with this highly sensitive method. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据