4.5 Article

Climate change and infectious diseases: Can we meet the needs for better prediction?

期刊

CLIMATIC CHANGE
卷 118, 期 3-4, 页码 625-640

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10584-013-0744-1

关键词

-

资金

  1. La Caixa Foundation
  2. ENSEMBLES project [GOCE-CT-2003-505539]
  3. CIRCE-EUFP6
  4. NIH/NSF EID [0430120]
  5. NOAA
  6. EU
  7. European Commission [243964]
  8. DENFREE: DENgue research Framework for Resisting Epidemics in Europe of the EUFP7 programme project
  9. Direct For Biological Sciences
  10. Emerging Frontiers [0430120] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  11. Direct For Education and Human Resources
  12. Division Of Graduate Education [1239797] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  13. ICREA Funding Source: Custom

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The next generation of climate-driven, disease prediction models will most likely require a mechanistically based, dynamical framework that parameterizes key processes at a variety of locations. Over the next two decades, consensus climate predictions make it possible to produce forecasts for a number of important infectious diseases that are largely independent of the uncertainty of longer-term emissions scenarios. In particular, the role of climate in the modulation of seasonal disease transmission needs to be unravelled from the complex dynamics resulting from the interaction of transmission with herd immunity and intervention measures that depend upon previous burdens of infection. Progress is also needed to solve the mismatch between climate projections and disease projections at the scale of public health interventions. In the time horizon of seasons to years, early warning systems should benefit from current developments on multi-model ensemble climate prediction systems, particularly in areas where high skill levels of climate models coincide with regions where large epidemics take place. A better understanding of the role of climate extremes on infectious diseases is urgently needed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据