4.2 Article

Hydrological drought response to meteorological drought in the Iberian Peninsula

期刊

CLIMATE RESEARCH
卷 58, 期 2, 页码 117-131

出版社

INTER-RESEARCH
DOI: 10.3354/cr01177

关键词

Hydrological drought; Meteorological drought; Drought time scales; Standardized precipitation index; Standardized streamflow index; Water management

资金

  1. Aragon Government (Spain)
  2. Spanish Commission of Science and Technology
  3. FEDER
  4. EURO-GEOSS [FP7-ENV-2008-1-226487]
  5. ACQWA [FP7-ENV-2007-1-212250]
  6. VII Framework Program of the European Commission
  7. 'Obra Social La Caixa'
  8. Aragon Government
  9. [CGL2006-11619/HID]
  10. [CGL2008-01189/BTE]
  11. [CGL2011-27574-C02-02]
  12. [CGL2011-27536]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study we assessed the impact of meteorological droughts on streamflow droughts in 187 river basins of the Iberian Peninsula. For each basin we correlated the 1 mo to 48 mo standardized precipitation index (SPI) with the standardized streamflow index to assess the response time of streamflow droughts to the SPI, and to determine the best climatic time scale over which to monitor hydrological droughts. In addition, we analyzed the effects of dam construction and reservoir use on changes in the response of hydrological droughts. The analysis revealed 2 main types of hydrological drought response to meteorological drought: (1) a peak response pattern involving enhanced hydrological sensitivity at short SPI time scales, which largely characterized basins in the northern sector of the Iberian Peninsula, and (2) a sustained response pattern involving greater sensitivity to meteorological droughts at much longer time scales, which primarily characterized the central and southern basins of the Iberian Peninsula. Water management has significantly altered the natural hydrological response to meteorological droughts, delaying the impacts of precipitation deficits over long time scales, especially downstream of reservoirs used for irrigation purposes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据