4.0 Article

Abundant epicardial adipose tissue surrounding the left atrium predicts early rather than late recurrence of atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10840-015-0031-3

关键词

Atrial fibrillation; Ablation; Early recurrence; Epicardial adipose tissue

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) surrounding the left atrium has been reported to have a pro-arrhythmic influence on atrial myocardium and to play an important role in the pathophysiology of atrial fibrillation (AF). The purpose of this study was to explore whether the abundance of EAT correlates with early and late recurrences of AF after ablation. We included 53 consecutive patients with drug-refractory AF scheduled for ablation. Early and late recurrences were defined as atrial tachyarrhythmias within and after 3 months following the ablation procedure, respectively. The total and left atrial EAT volumes were obtained by 320-detector-row multislice computed tomography. During a follow-up period of 16 +/- 4 months, early and late recurrences occurred in 29 (55 %) and 12 (23 %) patients, respectively. The left atrial EAT volume was larger in patients with than without early recurrence (35.1 +/- 13.1 vs. 25.0 +/- 9.5 cm(3), p = 0.002); however, there was no difference in the total EAT volume between the two groups (98.5 +/- 45.7 vs. 94.5 +/- 35.2 cm(3), p = 0.72). A multivariate analysis revealed that a large left atrial EAT volume, persistent AF, and large left atrial volume were independent predictors of early recurrence. Conversely, there was no significant difference in left atrial (29.3 +/- 14.6 vs. 29.7 +/- 11.7 cm(3), p = 0.93) and total EAT (91.0 +/- 50.1 vs. 97.9 +/- 37.0 cm(3), p = 0.66) volumes between patients with and without late recurrence. The abundance of left atrial EAT independently predicted early recurrence after AF ablation; on the contrary, it did not have an impact on late recurrence. Left atrial EAT may have a pro-arrhythmic influence, especially in the early post-ablation phase.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据