4.3 Review

Effect of phytoestrogens on sexual function in menopausal women: a systematic review and meta-analysis

期刊

CLIMACTERIC
卷 21, 期 5, 页码 437-445

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/13697137.2018.1472566

关键词

Phytoestrogens; sexual function; postmenopausal and perimenopausal; systematic review; meta-analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to critically evaluate the effectiveness of phytoestrogens on sexual disorders and severity of dyspareunia.Materials and methods: Relevant studies were identified through a systematic search of major databases such as PubMed, Cochrane Library, ISI Web of Science, and Scopus up to 29 September 2017, without any time limit. Two independent reviewers screened all abstracts and full-text articles. The final version of Jadad scale was used for evaluating the quality of trials.Results: Soy did not have an effect on sexual function (standardized mean difference [SMD]=1.099 [95% CI: -3.033 to 0.835, p=0.265]; heterogeneity I-2=80%; p=0.006; random-effect model; three trials) but improved dyspareunia (p>0.05). Red clover showed no significant effect on sexual function (SMD=-0.087 [95% CI: -0.936 to 0.763, p=0.842]; heterogeneity I-2=0%, p=0.397; fixed-effect model; two trials) and sexual satisfaction (p>0.05). Phytoestrogens isolated from Lepidium meyenii, Foeniculum vulgare, and maritime pine bark as well as Trigonella foenum-graecum L. significantly improved sexual function. In contrast, phytoestrogens isolated from Korean red ginseng and flaxseed did not lead to significant effect on sexual function. The positive effects of Trigonella foenum-graecum L. were observed on libido.Conclusion: Phytoestrogens have various effects on sexual function. Published reports show that maritime pine bark, T. foenum-graecum L., and F. vulgare could be considered as agents to overcome sexual dysfunctions while soy, red clover, genistein, and flaxseed had no promising effects on these conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据