4.3 Article

Guizhi Fuling capsule, an ancient Chinese formula, attenuates endometriosis in rats via induction of apoptosis

期刊

CLIMACTERIC
卷 17, 期 4, 页码 410-416

出版社

INFORMA HEALTHCARE
DOI: 10.3109/13697137.2013.876618

关键词

CHINESE MEDICINE; GUIZHI FULING CAPSULE; ENDOMETRIUM; APOPTOSIS

资金

  1. Jiangsu Provincial Administration of traditional Chinese Medicine Program [LZ1058, LZ13084]
  2. Jiangsu Research Institute of Traditional Chinese Medicine Program [BK201020501]
  3. Jiangsu province's Outstanding Leader Program of Traditional Chinese Medicine [RC1006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective The Guizhi Fuling (GZFL) capsule has been a traditional Chinese medicine for the treatment of gynecological inflammation for the past thousands of years. However, as a formula, its therapeutic mechanism has not been clearly elucidated. The aim of this study is to investigate the role of apoptosis during GZFL capsule therapy for the treatment of endometrial hyperplasia. Methods The rat model of endometriosis was established, and the rats were given different doses of GZFL capsule. Uterine histomorphometric analysis, real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) and Western blotting were performed. The terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TdT)-mediated dUTP biotin nick end labeling (TUNEL) method was performed to analyze the apoptosis induced by the GZFL capsule. Results The TUNEL assay showed that different doses of GZFL capsule were able to induce apoptosis in rat endometriotic cells. qPCR and Western blot analysis showed that the GZFL capsule can inhibit the mRNA levels of the survivin gene. In addition, the GZFL capsule can inhibit the mRNA level of the mitochondrial apoptotic pathway-related apoptosis-inhibiting factor Bcl-2 but increases the mRNA level of apoptosis-promoting factor Bax. Conclusions These results indicate that the GZFL capsule can induce apoptosis of endometriotic cells and inhibit cell proliferation and metastasis of endometriotic cells through the mitochondrial apoptotic pathway.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据