4.3 Article

Health-related quality of life of women with menopausal hot flushes and night sweats

期刊

CLIMACTERIC
卷 16, 期 2, 页码 235-239

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/13697137.2012.688078

关键词

HEALTH-RELATED QUALITY OF LIFE; MENOPAUSE; PHYSICAL AND MENTAL HEALTH; HOT FLUSHES; NIGHT SWEATS; VASOMOTOR SYMPTOMS

资金

  1. NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London
  2. Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust
  3. Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives Despite a large body of research on menopause, there is little definitive evidence of the impact of vasomotor symptoms on health-related quality of life (HrQoL). Therefore, this study describes the HrQoL of menopausal women with hot flushes and night sweats and examines predictors of HrQoL. Methods A total of 140 women reporting at least ten hot flushes/night sweats (vasomotor symptoms) a week for at least a month completed an assessment interview (including medical history, past and current physical and mental health and menopausal status) and questionnaires eliciting sociodemographic and help-seeking information, HrQoL and the Hot Flush Rating Scale. Results Women with vasomotor symptoms reported somewhat reduced HrQoL compared to SF-36 US norms and a general sample of UK menopausal women; 53% reported comorbid physical illness and 66% had current psychosocial concerns; 77% had visited their doctor about menopausal symptoms; 28% were past and 3% current users of hormone therapy. Overall, poor HrQoL was associated with having problematic hot flushes, current psychosocial concerns, (younger) age, (higher) body mass index and poor general health. Conclusions This sample of relatively healthy mid-aged women with vasomotor symptoms reported reduced HrQoL compared to age-matched norms and a general sample of menopausal women. Problem rating, rather than frequency, of hot flushes was associated with reduced HrQoL, as were health and psychosocial factors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据