4.5 Article

The Ecological Sensitivity Evaluation in Yellow River Delta National Natural Reserve

期刊

CLEAN-SOIL AIR WATER
卷 40, 期 10, 页码 1197-1207

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/clen.201200051

关键词

Ecosystem; Habitat suitability assessment; Human interference analysis

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [40671072, 41071330]
  2. National water pollution control and management technology major projects [2009ZX07209-008]
  3. Opening Foundation of State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science [OFXLRSS201004]
  4. China National Funds for Distinguished Young Scientists [51125035]
  5. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities 307 [2009SD-24]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Based on the grid analysis of GIS, with the combination of habitat suitability assessment and human interference analysis, the ecological sensitivity evaluation model was established. Firstly, the endangered water-birds in Yellow River Delta NNR were prioritized as a database according to IUCN 2007 Red List, and the habitat preference was identified and evaluated through literatures review and field survey. By establishing GIS-based 200?x?200?m grid system, the existing habitat was evaluated on landscape-level, and a comprehensive habitat suitability index (CHSI) was developed and calculated by habitat suitability assessment model. Based on CHSI, the habitat suitability was evaluated and graded. Secondly, the typical species cranes was selected from the established database as indicator species and the habitat loss rate of indicator species associated with anthropogenic interference (roads and oil wells) was also analyzed on 200?x?200?m grids by GIS. Finally, on the basis of results from habitat suitability evaluation and human interference analysis, ecological sensitivity analysis was conducted by overlying operation. The results showed that: the ecological sensitivity of study area was quite high on the whole; the overall distribution was high in the coastal region while low in the inland region, ranking in five classes. In the area, extreme sensitivity zone and fair sensitivity zone accounted for about 55.74%, the moderate sensitivity zone was about 16.2%, the sensitivity zone and no sensitivity zone constituted 22.81 and 5.19%, respectively. In addition, compared with existing function zones, related suggestions for adjusting function zones were proposed aiming at enhancing the conservation efficacy of critical habitats.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据