4.5 Article

Artificial neural network model for predicting methane percentage in biogas recovered from a landfill upon injection of liquid organic waste

期刊

CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY
卷 17, 期 2, 页码 443-453

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10098-014-0798-4

关键词

Artificial neural networks (ANNs); Food waste leachate; Landfill; Landfill gas; Methane recovery; Performance prediction

资金

  1. University of Ulsan, South Korea
  2. KICOX, South Korea [2005-B029-01]
  3. GMR Institute of Technology, Rajam (Autonomous), India

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Field-scale investigation for a period of more than four months was conducted to evaluate the performance of a landfill for biogas extraction upon the injection of food waste leachate (FWL), a liquid organic waste generated from the food waste recycling facilities in Korea. The target was set at recovering about 50-60 % methane from the landfill gas (LFG) at extraction rates varying between 10 and 30 m(3)/h. An application of the artificial neural network (ANN) was presented in this paper to predict the performance parameter namely methane percentage (%). The input parameters to the network were LFG extraction rate (m(3)/h) and landfill leachate: FWL ratio, respectively, which were obtained from the field-scale investigation. Four different back error propagation learning algorithms were used to train the ANN for a comparative analysis, and the best among them was selected. To substantiate our claim, performance of the network was analyzed for different set of training and test data points. Predictions were attained by appropriately selecting the network parameters and, adequately training the network with 130 set of data points. The accuracy of back propagation neural network (BPNN)-based model predictions was evaluated by calculating the correlation coefficient (R) and mean absolute percentage error values. The results from this predictive modeling work showed that BPNNs were able to predict the methane percentage of the LFG in an acceptable range.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据