4.5 Article

Green etherification of bioglycerol with 1-phenyl ethanol over supported heteropolyacid

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10098-011-0380-2

关键词

Heteropolyacid; Hexagonal mesoporous silica; Bioglycerol; 1-Phenyl ethanol; Etherification; Solvent-free condition; Green chemistry

资金

  1. Darbari Seth Distinguished Professor endowment
  2. R. T. Mody Distinguished Professor endowment
  3. Department of Science and Technology, Govt. of India
  4. CSIR-NMITLI
  5. National Academies

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Escalating demand for biodiesel production has generated surplus glycerol. Therefore, the consumption of glycerol for valuable conversions has become a global challenge. In an effort to convert glycerol, we have etherified it to make a biologically active component, 3-(1-phenylethoxy) propane-1,2-diol. Etherification of glycerol with 1-phenyl ethanol was carried out by using heterogeneous acid catalysts. The process is green and clean. Different types of heteropolyacids (HPAs) supported on hexagonal mesoporous silica (HMS) and K-10 clay were prepared by incipient-wetness technique and screened to get high selectivity towards monoether of glycerol. 20% w/w dodeca-tungstophosphoric acid (DTP)/HMS was found to be the best. The effects of various reaction parameters such as speed of agitation, catalyst loading, mole ratio of reactants and temperature were evaluated systematically to prove that the reaction obeys Langmuir-Hinshelwood-Hougen-Watson (LHHW) type of mechanism. It was also observed that the reaction was free from any external mass transfer as well as intra-particle diffusion limitations and was intrinsically kinetically controlled. An overall second order kinetic equation was used to fit the experimental data, under the assumption that all the species are weakly adsorbed on the catalytic sites. Apparent activation energy was estimated as 27.0 kcal/mol. Solvent-free condition for this reaction has also added the green chemistry perception to the reaction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据