4.2 Article

Effects of pH, Ca- and SO4-concentration on surface charge and colloidal stability of goethite and hematite - consequences for the adsorption of anionic organic substances

期刊

CLAY MINERALS
卷 45, 期 1, 页码 1-13

出版社

MINERALOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1180/claymin.2010.045.1.01

关键词

Fe oxides; streaming potential; polyelectrolyte titration; flocculation; ion adsorption; goethite; hematite

资金

  1. BmBF [SN-01/19]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Soil solution chemistry, especially pH and the presence of multivalent ions, affects the surface charge (SC) of Fe oxides and accordingly colloidal stability and sorption properties. The SC of synthetic goethite and hematite was quantified in the presence of different electrolytes (NaCl, CaCl2, Na2SO4 and CaSO4) by combining the streaming potential with polyelectrolyte titration. The point of zero charge (PZC) for goethite was observed at pH 8.2 and the stability field around the PZC, where colloids are flocculated, is more extended (+/- 1 pH unit) than that of hematite with a PZC at pH 7.1 (+/- 0.5 pH unit). The SC decreases with increasing SO4 concentration, indicating adsorption of SO4 on the oxide, whereas the presence of Ca increases the SC. At pH 4, the addition of 0.1 mmol l(-1) Na2SO4 induced a decrease in SC from 1.5 to 0.380 mu mol(c) m(-2) for goethite and from 0.85 to 0.42 mu mol(c) m(-2) for hematite. In a suspension with 0.1 mmol l(-1) Na2SO4, the number of colloids is already reduced, and both oxides flocculate rapidly and completely at >0.5 mmol l(-1) Na2SO4. While the addition of SO4 did not affect charge titrations with the cationic polyelectrolyte, the anionic polyelectrolyte formed complexes with Ca, resulting in an overestimation of positive SC. The electrolyte CaSO4 is most efficient at keeping goethite and hematite M the pH range 4-10 in the flocculated state. Besides pH, the presence of multivalent ions should also be considered when predicting colloid mediated transport and adsorption properties of anionic substances by Fe oxides in soil systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据