4.4 Article

Normal intuitionistic fuzzy Bonferroni mean operators and their applications to multiple attribute group decision making

期刊

JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS
卷 29, 期 5, 页码 2205-2216

出版社

IOS PRESS
DOI: 10.3233/IFS-151696

关键词

Multiple attribute group decision making; normal intuitionistic fuzzy numbers; Bonferroni mean; normal intuitionistic fuzzy Bonferroni mean operator; normal intuitionistic fuzzy geometric Bonferroni mean operator

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71271124, 71471172]
  2. Humanities and Social Sciences Research Project of Ministry of Education of China [13YJC630104]
  3. Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation [ZR2013GQ011]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Normal intuitionistic fuzzy numbers (NIFNs), which express their membership degree and non-membership degree as normal fuzzy numbers, can better character normal distribution phenomena existing in the real world. In this paper, we investigate the multiple attribute decision making problems with normal intuitionistic fuzzy information. Firstly, we introduce some operational laws, score function and accuracy function of NIFNs. Then, motivated by the ideal of Bonferroni mean, which can capture the interrelationship between input arguments, we develop some normal intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators, including the normal intuitionistic fuzzy Bonferroni mean (NIFBM) operator, the normal intuitionistic fuzzy weighted Bonferroni mean (NIFWBM) operator, the normal intuitionistic fuzzy geometric Bonferroni mean (NIFGBM) operator and the normal intuitionistic fuzzy geometric weighted Bonferroni mean (NIFGWBM) operator; and discuss some desirable properties of these operators. Furthermore, based on these operators, we propose a new approach for the multiple attribute group decision making under normal intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Finally, we give a numerical example to illustrate the effectiveness and feasibility of the developed approach.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据