4.3 Article

Rates, Characteristics, and Outcomes of Patients Transferred to Specialized Stroke Centers for Advanced Care

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.116.003359

关键词

humans; hypertension; mortality; registries; stroke

资金

  1. Patient-Centered Outcome Research Institute
  2. Amarin
  3. Amgen
  4. AstraZeneca
  5. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  6. Chiesi
  7. Eisai
  8. Ethicon
  9. Forest Laboratories
  10. Ironwood
  11. Ischemix
  12. Lilly
  13. Medtronic
  14. Pfizer
  15. Roche
  16. Sanofi Aventis
  17. Medicines Company
  18. National Institutes of Neurological Disorders and Stroke

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: While many patients are transferred to specialized stroke centers for advanced acute ischemic stroke (AIS) care, few studies have characterized these patients. We sought to determine variation in the rates and differences in the baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes between AIS cases presenting directly to stroke centers' front door versus Transfer-Ins from another hospital. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analyzed 970 390 AIS cases in the Get With The Guidelines-Stroke registry from January 2010 to March 2014 to compare hospitals with high Transfer-In rates (>= 15%) versus those with low Transfer-In rates (<5%) and to compare the front-door versus Transfer-In patients admitted to those hospitals with high Transfer-In rates (high Transfer-In hospitals). Of 970 390 patients discharged from 1646 hospitals, 87% initially presented via the emergency department versus 13% were a Transfer-In from another hospital. High Transfer-In hospitals had a median 31% Transfer-In rate among all stroke discharges, were larger, had higher annual AIS volume and intravenous tPA (tissue-type plasminogen activator) rates, and were more often Midwest teaching hospitals and stroke centers. Compared with front-door, Transfer-In patients were younger, more often white, had higher median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores, less often hypertension and previous stroke/transient ischemic attack, and higher in-hospital mortality (7.9% versus 4.9%; standardized difference, 12.4%). After multivariable adjustment, Transfer-In patients had higher in-hospital mortality and discharge modified Rankin scale. CONCLUSIONS: There is significant regional variability in the transfer of patients with AIS. Because Transfer-In patients seem to have worse short-term outcomes, these patients have the potential to negatively influence institutional mortality rates and should be accounted for explicitly in hospital risk-profiling measures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据