4.7 Article

Overexpression of potato miR482e enhanced plant sensitivity to Verticillium dahliae infection

期刊

JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE PLANT BIOLOGY
卷 57, 期 12, 页码 1078-1088

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jipb.12348

关键词

miR482; nucleotide binding site leucine-rich repeat; potato; sRNA; ta-siRNA; Verticillium dahliae; Verticillium wilt

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11171155]
  2. National Pear Industry Technology System [CARS-29]
  3. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions: Modern horticultural science (PAPD)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Verticillium wilt of potato is caused by the fungus pathogen Verticillium dahliae. Present sRNA sequencing data revealed that miR482 was in response to V. dahliae infection, but the function in potato is elusive. Here, we characterized potato miR482 family and its putative role resistance to Verticillium wilt. Members of the potato miR482 superfamily are variable in sequence, but all variants target a class of disease-resistance proteins with nucleotide binding site (NBS) and leucine-rich repeat (LRR) motifs. When potato plantlets were infected with V. dahliae, the expression level of miR482e was downregulated, and that of several NBS-LRR targets of miR482e were upregulated. Transgenic potato plantlets overexpressing miR482e showed hypersensitivity to V. dahliae infection. Using sRNA and degradome datasets, we validated that miR482e targets mRNAs of NBS-LRR disease-resistance proteins and triggers the production of trans-acting (ta)siRNAs, most of which target mRNAs of defense-related proteins. Thus, the hypersensitivity of transgenic potato could be explained by enhanced miR482e and miR482e-derived tasiRNA-mediated silencing on NBS-LRR-disease-resistance proteins. It is speculated that a miR482-mediated silencing cascade mechanism is involved in regulating potato resistance against V. dahliae infection and could be a counter defense action of plant in response to pathogen infection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据