4.3 Article

Sources of Hospital Variation in Short-Term Readmission Rates After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

期刊

CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS
卷 5, 期 2, 页码 227-236

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.111.967638

关键词

performance measures; percutaneous coronary intervention; outcomes research

资金

  1. Massachusetts Department of Public Health
  2. American Heart Association [12CRP9010016]
  3. Abbott Vascular
  4. Bard Peripheral Vascular
  5. Consulting/Advisory Board: Abbott Vascular
  6. Angioguard (Cordis)
  7. Boston Scientific Corp
  8. Complete Conference Manager
  9. Harvard Clinical Research Institute
  10. Equity: Lumen Biomedical
  11. Medical Stimulation Corp
  12. VIVA Physicians Association
  13. Abbott
  14. Boston Scientific
  15. Cordis
  16. Medtronic
  17. Eli Lilly
  18. Daiichi Sankyo
  19. Bristol Myers Squibb
  20. Sanofi-Aventis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background-Risk-standardized all-cause 30-day readmission rates (RSRRs) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have been endorsed as a national measure of hospital quality. Little is known about variation in the performance of hospitals on this measure, and whether high hospital rates of readmission after PCI are due to modifiable deficiencies in quality of care has not been assessed. Methods and Results-We estimated 30-day, all-cause RSRRs for all nonfederal PCI-performing hospitals in Massachusetts, adjusted for clinical and angiographic variables, between 2005 and 2008. We assessed if differences in race, insurance type, and PCI and post-PCI characteristics, including procedural complications and discharge characteristics, could explain variation between hospitals using nested hierarchical logistic regression models. Of 36 060 patients undergoing PCI at 24 hospitals and surviving to discharge, 4469 (12.4%) were readmitted within 30 days of discharge. Hospital RSRRs ranged from 9.5% to 17.9%, with 8 of 24 hospitals being identified as outliers (4 lower than expected and 4 higher than expected). Differences in race, insurance, PCI, and post-PCI factors accounted for 10.4% of the between- hospital variance in RSRRs. Conclusions-We observed wide variation in hospital 30-day all-cause RSRRs after PCI, most of which could not be explained by identifiable differences in procedural and postprocedural factors. A better understanding of etiologies of hospital variation is necessary to determine whether this measure is an actionable assessment of hospital quality, and, if so, how hospitals might improve their performance. (Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;5:227-236.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据