4.7 Article

Statistical modeling of nitrogen-dependent modulation of root system architecture in Arabidopsis thaliana

期刊

JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE PLANT BIOLOGY
卷 58, 期 3, 页码 254-265

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jipb.12433

关键词

Ammonium; mathematical modeling; nitrate; nitrogen; root system architecture

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [IOS-1444549]
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [WI1728/13-1]
  3. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Plant root development is strongly affected by nutrient availability. Despite the importance of structure and function of roots in nutrient acquisition, statistical modeling approaches to evaluate dynamic and temporal modulations of root system architecture in response to nutrient availability have remained as widely open and exploratory areas in root biology. In this study, we developed a statistical modeling approach to investigate modulations of root system architecture in response to nitrogen availability. Mathematical models were designed for quantitative assessment of root growth and root branching phenotypes and their dynamic relationships based on hierarchical configuration of primary and lateral roots formulating the fishbone-shaped root system architecture in Arabidopsis thaliana. Time-series datasets reporting dynamic changes in root developmental traits on different nitrate or ammonium concentrations were generated for statistical analyses. Regression analyses unraveled key parameters associated with: (i) inhibition of primary root growth under nitrogen limitation or on ammonium; (ii) rapid progression of lateral root emergence in response to ammonium; and (iii) inhibition of lateral root elongation in the presence of excess nitrate or ammonium. This study provides a statistical framework for interpreting dynamic modulation of root system architecture, supported by meta-analysis of datasets displaying morphological responses of roots to diverse nitrogen supplies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据