4.6 Article

99mTc-Pyrophosphate Scintigraphy for Differentiating Light-Chain Cardiac Amyloidosis From the Transthyretin-Related Familial and Senile Cardiac Amyloidoses

期刊

CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING
卷 6, 期 2, 页码 195-201

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.112.000132

关键词

Tc-99m-PYP scintigraphy; AL amyloid; ATTR transthyretin cardiomyopathy; technetium

资金

  1. Pfizer, Inc
  2. FoldRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background-Differentiating amyloid light-chain (AL) from transthyretin-related cardiac amyloidoses (ATTR) is imperative given implications for prognosis, therapy, and genetic counseling. We validated the discriminatory ability of Tc-99m-pyrophosphate (Tc-99m-PYP) scintigraphy in AL versus ATTR. Methods and Results-Forty-five subjects (12 AL, 16 ATTR wild type, and 17 ATTR mutants) underwent Tc-99m-PYP planar and single-photon positive emission computed tomography cardiac imaging. Scans were performed by experienced nuclear cardiologists blinded to the subjects' cohort assignment. Cardiac retention was assessed with both a semiquantitative visual score (range, 0; no uptake to 3, diffuse uptake) and by quantitative analysis by drawing a region of interest over the heart corrected for contralateral counts and calculating a heart-to-contralateral ratio. Subjects with ATTR cardiac amyloid had a significantly higher semiquantitative cardiac visual score than the AL cohort (2.9 +/- 0.06 versus 0.8 +/- 0.27; P<0.0001) as well as a higher quantitative score (1.80 +/- 0.04 versus 1.21 +/- 0.04; P<0.0001). Using a heart-to-contralateral ratio >1.5 consistent with intensely diffuse myocardial tracer retention had a 97% sensitivity and 100% specificity with area under the curve 0.992, P<0.0001 for identifying ATTR cardiac amyloidosis. Conclusions-Tc-99m-PYP cardiac imaging distinguishes AL from ATTR cardiac amyloidosis and may be a simple, widely available method for identifying subjects with ATTR cardiac amyloidosis, which should be studied in a larger prospective manner.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据