4.6 Article

Impact of Longitudinal Myocardial Deformation on the Prognosis of Chronic Heart Failure Patients

期刊

CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING
卷 3, 期 3, 页码 249-256

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.109.910893

关键词

heart failure; prognosis; longitudinal function; global strain

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background-Longitudinal myocardial deformation indexes appear superior to left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in assessing myocardial contractility. However, few studies have addressed the prognostic value of longitudinal motion markers (velocity, strain, and strain rate) in predicting outcome in heart failure patients. Methods and Results-The study included 125 consecutive symptomatic heart failure patients (63 +/- 16 years, 77% male, LVEF = 31 +/- 10%). All patients underwent a complete echocardiographic and clinical examination, and brain natriuretic peptide level was assessed in 93 patients. Longitudinal myocardial velocity by tissue Doppler imaging, global-epsilon, and strain rate by speckle tracking were computed from apical views (4-, 3-, and 2-chambers views) and compared with the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events. On the whole, peak longitudinal velocity, global-epsilon, and strain rate averaged 5 +/- 2 cm/s (range, 1 to 9), -8 +/- 3% (range, -3 to -18), and -0.33 +/- 0.16 s(-1) (range, -0.83 to -0.05), respectively. During the follow-up period (266 +/- 177 days), major adverse cardiac events occurred in 47 (38%) patients (15 deaths, 29 recurrent heart failure, and 4 heart transplantations). By univariable analysis using Cox model global-epsilon, strain rate, and LVEF were associated with the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events, whereas only global-epsilon remained independently predictive of outcome by multivariate analysis. Conclusions-In the heart failure population, longitudinal global strain by speckle tracking is superior to LVEF and other longitudinal markers in identifying patients with poor outcome. (Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010; 3: 249-256.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据