3.8 Article

Design of the Coronary ARtery DIsease Genome-Wide Replication And Meta-Analysis (CARDIoGRAM) Study A Genome-Wide Association Meta-analysis Involving More Than 22 000 Cases and 60 000 Controls

期刊

CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR GENETICS
卷 3, 期 5, 页码 475-U186

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCGENETICS.109.899443

关键词

coronary artery disease; myocardial infarction; meta-analysis; genetics

资金

  1. Reynold's Foundation
  2. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) [HL087647]
  3. Boehringer Ingelheim
  4. PHILIPS Medical Systems
  5. Government of Rheinland-Pfalz
  6. Johannes-Gutenberg University of Mainz
  7. Fondation de France, the French Ministry of Research
  8. Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale
  9. National Institutes of Health (NIH) NHLBI [R01HL089650-02]
  10. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  11. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF)
  12. German National Genome Research Network
  13. European Union (EU) [LSHM-CT-2006-037593, LSHM-CT-2004-503485, HEALTH-F2-2008-201668]
  14. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research
  15. Sanofi/Aventis
  16. Roche
  17. Dade Behring/Siemens
  18. AstraZeneca
  19. US NIH
  20. NHLBI
  21. Broad Institute Center for Genotyping and Analysis
  22. National Center for Research Resources [U54 RR020278]
  23. Cardiovascular Institute of the University of Pennsylvania
  24. MedStar Research Institute
  25. Washington Hospital Center
  26. GlaxoSmithKline
  27. University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine
  28. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) [MOP82810, MOP172605, MOP77682]
  29. Canadian Funds for Innovation (CFI) [11966]
  30. Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario [NA6001]
  31. Wellcome Trust
  32. BHF
  33. UK Medical Research Council
  34. Leicester National Institute of Health Research Biomedical Research Unit in Cardiovascular Disease
  35. NGFNplus
  36. BMBF
  37. NIH/National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI)
  38. NIH/NHLBI
  39. National Cancer Institute Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics
  40. Heart & Stroke Funds Ontario
  41. CFI
  42. Cystic Fibrosis Foundation
  43. Cancer Immunology and Hematology Branch
  44. Institute for Biomedical Sciences, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan
  45. Academia Sinica
  46. Pfizer
  47. CIHR
  48. [R01HG004517]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background-Recent genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of myocardial infarction (MI) and other forms of coronary artery disease (CAD) have led to the discovery of at least 13 genetic loci. In addition to the effect size, power to detect associations is largely driven by sample size. Therefore, to maximize the chance of finding novel susceptibility loci for CAD and MI, the Coronary ARtery DIsease Genome-wide Replication And Meta-analysis (CARDIoGRAM) consortium was formed. Methods and Results-CARDIoGRAM combines data from all published and several unpublished GWAS in individuals with European ancestry; includes >22 000 cases with CAD, MI, or both and >60 000 controls; and unifies samples from the Atherosclerotic Disease VAscular functioN and genetiC Epidemiology study, CADomics, Cohorts for Heart and Aging Research in Genomic Epidemiology, deCODE, the German Myocardial Infarction Family Studies I, II, and III, Ludwigshafen Risk and Cardiovascular Heath Study/AtheroRemo, MedStar, Myocardial Infarction Genetics Consortium, Ottawa Heart Genomics Study, PennCath, and the Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium. Genotyping was carried out on Affymetrix or Illumina platforms followed by imputation of genotypes in most studies. On average, 2.2 million single nucleotide polymorphisms were generated per study. The results from each study are combined using meta-analysis. As proof of principle, we meta-analyzed risk variants at 9p21 and found that rs1333049 confers a 29% increase in risk for MI per copy (P=2x10(-20)). Conclusion-CARDIoGRAM is poised to contribute to our understanding of the role of common genetic variation on risk for CAD and MI. (Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2010;3:475-483.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据