4.5 Article

Adenosine-Induced Pulmonary Vein Ectopy as a Predictor of Recurrent Atrial Fibrillation After Pulmonary Vein Isolation

期刊

CIRCULATION-ARRHYTHMIA AND ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY
卷 6, 期 6, 页码 1066-1073

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCEP.113.000796

关键词

adenosine; atrial fibrillation; catheter ablation

资金

  1. Biosense Webster
  2. Medtronic
  3. St Jude Medical

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Adenosine can unmask dormant pulmonary vein (PV) conduction after PV isolation. Adenosine can also induce ectopy in electrically silent PVs after isolation, possibly via activation of autonomic triggers. We sought to identify the implications of adenosine-induced PV ectopy for atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence after PV isolation. Methods and Results A total of 152 patients (age, 6011 years; 63% paroxysmal AF) undergoing PV isolation for AF were studied. After each PV was isolated, adenosine was administered and the presence of adenosine-induced PV reconnection and PV ectopy were recorded. Dormant conduction was targeted with additional ablation. Adenosine-induced PV ectopy was seen in 45 (30%) patients, and dormant conduction was seen in 44 (29%) patients. After a median follow-up of 374 days, 48 (32%) patients had recurrent AF after a single ablation procedure. Rates of freedom from AF among patients with adenosine-induced PV ectopy were significantly lower than patients without adenosine-induced PV ectopy (63% versus 76% at 1 year; log rank, 0.014). Rates of freedom from AF among patients with dormant conduction were also lower than patients without dormant conduction (64% versus 76% at 1 year; log rank, 0.062). With multivariate analysis, adenosine-induced PV ectopy was found to be the only independent predictor of AF after PV isolation (hazard ratio, 1.90; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-3.40; P=0.032). Conclusions Adenosine-induced PV ectopy is a predictor of recurrent AF after PV isolation and may be a marker of increased susceptibility to autonomic triggers of AF.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据