4.5 Article

Remote Robotic Navigation and Electroanatomical Mapping for Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation Considerations for Navigation and Impact on Procedural Outcome

期刊

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCEP.108.818211

关键词

ablation; fibrillation; mapping; pulmonary vein isolation; remote robotic navigation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background-Radiofrequency current ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) requires high technical skills to achieve optimal catheter stability and is associated with an individually high x-ray exposure to both the patient and the operator. To facilitate catheter navigation and to reduce the operator's x-ray burden, remote navigation (RN) systems have been developed. Considerations for navigation of a novel remote robotic navigation system in pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) procedures are reported. Methods and Results-In 65 patients with drug-refractory AF (43 paroxysmal, 22 persistent), complete circumferential PVI was performed using RN in conjunction with different electroanatomic mapping systems. Acute complete PVI using exclusively RN was achieved in 95%. The procedure time was 195 +/- 40 minutes. The operator's x-ray exposure time was reduced by 6 +/- 4 minutes (35%) using RN. In 7 of 14 patients with persistent AF, conversion to sinus rhythm was achieved by radiofrequency current ablation. During a median follow-up period of 239 days (range, 184 to 314 days), 47 of 65 patients (73%) remained free of any documented atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrences after a single procedure. The relative proportion of patients remaining free of A-F was 76% and 68% for paroxysmal and persistent AF, respectively. Conclusions-PVI using the novel RN system can be performed safely and effectively. One third of the operator's fluoroscopy exposure time might be saved using RN. However, the questions of whether the overall fluoroscopy exposure is reduced by RN and whether RN improves PVI procedures needs to be assessed during a comparative trial between man and machine. (Circ Arrhythmia Electrophysiol. 2009;2:120-128.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据