4.7 Article

Hyperphosphorylation of the Cardiac Ryanodine Receptor at Serine 2808 Is Not Involved in Cardiac Dysfunction After Myocardial Infarction

期刊

CIRCULATION RESEARCH
卷 110, 期 6, 页码 831-U87

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.111.255158

关键词

myocardial infarction; ryanodine receptor; heart failure; PKA hyperphosphorylation

资金

  1. NIH [HL089312, HL033921, HL091799, HL55438]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rationale: Abnormal behavior of the cardiac ryanodine receptor (RyR2) has been linked to cardiac arrhythmias and heart failure (HF) after myocardial infarction (MI). It has been proposed that protein kinase A (PKA) hyperphosphorylation of the RyR2 at a single residue, Ser-2808, is a critical mediator of RyR dysfunction, depressed cardiac performance, and HF after MI. Objective: We used a mouse model (RyRS2808A) in which PKA hyperphosphorylation of the RyR2 at Ser-2808 is prevented to determine whether loss of PKA phosphorylation at this site averts post MI cardiac pump dysfunction. Methods and Results: MI was induced in wild-type (WT) and S2808A mice. Myocyte and cardiac function were compared in WT and S2808A animals before and after MI. The effects of the PKA activator Isoproterenol (ISO) on L-type Ca2+ current (I-CaL), contractions, and [Ca2+](I) transients were also measured. Both WT and S2808A mice had depressed pump function after MI, and there were no differences between groups. MI size was also identical in both groups. L type Ca2+ current, contractions, Ca2+ transients, and SR Ca2+ load were also not significantly different in WT versus S2808A myocytes either before or after MI. Iso effects on Ca2+ current, contraction, Ca2+ transients, and SR Ca2+ load were identical in WT and S2808A myocytes before and after MI at both low and high concentrations. Conclusions: These results strongly support the idea that PKA phosphorylation of RyR-S2808 is irrelevant to the development of cardiac dysfunction after MI, at least in the mice used in this study. (Circ Res. 2012; 110: 831-840.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据