4.7 Article

Wnt5a Is Required for Endothelial Differentiation of Embryonic Stem Cells and Vascularization via Pathways Involving Both Wnt/β-Catenin and Protein Kinase Cα

期刊

CIRCULATION RESEARCH
卷 104, 期 3, 页码 372-379

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.108.185405

关键词

Wnt5a; embryonic stem cells; beta-catenin; PKC alpha; endothelial differentiation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, we examined the signaling pathways activated by Wnt5a in endothelial differentiation of embryonic stem ( ES) cells and the function of Wnt5a during vascular development. We first found that Wnt5a (-/-) mouse embryonic stem ( mES) cells exhibited a defect in endothelial differentiation, which was rescued by addition of Wnt5a, suggesting that Wnt5a is required for endothelial differentiation of ES cells. Involvement of both beta-catenin and protein kinase (PK) C alpha pathways in endothelial differentiation of mES cells requiring Wnt5a was indicated by activation of both beta-catenin and PKC alpha in Wnt5a(+/-) but not in Wnt5a (-/-) mES cells. We also found that beta-catenin or PKC alpha knockdowns inhibited the Wnt5a- induced endothelial differentiation of ES cells. Moreover, the lack of endothelial differentiation of Wnt5a (-/-) mES cells was rescued only by transfection of both beta-catenin and PKC alpha, indicating that both genes are required for Wnt5a-mediated endothelial differentiation. Wnt5a was also found to be essential for the differentiation of mES cells into immature endothelial progenitor cells, which are known to play a role in repair of damaged endothelium. Furthermore, a defect in the vascularization of the neural tissue was detected at embryonic day 14.5 in Wnt5a (-/-) mice, implicating Wnt5a in vascular development in vivo. Thus, we conclude that Wnt5a is involved in the endothelial differentiation of ES cells via both Wnt/beta-catenin and PKC signaling pathways and regulates embryonic vascular development. ( Circ Res. 2009; 104: 372-379.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据