4.7 Article

Cardioprotection by ischemic postconditioning is lost in aged and STAT3-deficient mice

期刊

CIRCULATION RESEARCH
卷 102, 期 1, 页码 131-135

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.107.164699

关键词

signal transducer and activator of transcription 3; ischemic postconditioning; aging

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The cardioprotection by ischemic preconditioning is lost in aged wild-type and in STAT3 ( signal transducer and activator of transcription 3)-deficient mice. The aim of the present study was to analyze whether or not ischemic postconditioning (iPoco) was effective in aged mice hearts and whether iPoco was dependent on STAT3. Young (3 months) and aged (> 13 months) C57Bl6/J mice underwent 30 minutes of ischemia and 2 hours of reperfusion without or with iPoco (3 cycles of 10 seconds of ischemia/10 seconds of reperfusion [3 X 10] or 5 cycles of 5 seconds of ischemia/5 seconds of reperfusion [5 X 5] at the beginning of reperfusion). In young mice, both iPoco3X10 and iPoco5X5 reduced infarct size (IS), whereas in aged mice, only iPoco5X5 was effective in reducing IS. In young mice, iPoco3X10 increased the phosphorylated over total STAT3 (phosphorylated STAT3/STAT3) ratio at 10 minutes of reperfusion in the postconditioned anterior wall compared with the control posterior wall. In aged mice hearts, total STAT3 and phosphorylated STAT3/STAT3 in the anterior wall at reperfusion were reduced compared with young mice hearts. In young mice hearts subjected to iPoco3X10 but pretreated with the JAK-2 inhibitor AG-490, phosphorylated STAT3/STAT3 was reduced in the anterior wall compared with untreated young mice hearts, and IS reduction by iPoco3X10 was abolished. Furthermore, in young mice with a cardiomyocyte-restricted deletion of STAT3, iPoco3X10 failed to reduce IS, whereas iPoco5X5 reduced IS. Thus, cardioprotection by iPoco is dependent on the postconditioning protocol in aged and STAT3-deficient hearts. The reduced levels of STAT3 with increasing age may contribute to the age-related loss of iPoco.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据